One of the biggest mistakes organisations make is assuming

that governance must be all or nothing.

Either:

• a thick rulebook,

• multiple committees,

• heavy compliance,

or nothing at all.

Both extremes fail.

Real-world procurement needs graduated governance —

just enough structure for the risk at hand.

________________________________________

Governance is not a monument. It is a stack.

Think of procurement governance as a stack, not a single system.

You don’t install everything on day one.

You add layers as:

• volume increases,

• risk rises,

• and complexity deepens.

Overbuilding early suffocates operations.

Underbuilding late destroys trust.

________________________________________

Level 1: Lite Governance — “Don’t Hurt Anyone”

This is where most pilots and early-stage initiatives should begin.

It includes:

• clear buying authority,

• explicit refusal criteria,

• transparent pricing logic,

• fixed payment timelines.

No fancy tools.

No heavy reporting.

Just predictability.

This level protects:

• farmer dignity,

• staff sanity,

• and organisational reputation.

Anything less is reckless experimentation.

________________________________________

Level 2: Basic Governance — “Learn and Stabilise”

Once volumes repeat and relationships form,

memory becomes important.

This level adds:

• basic traceability,

• simple classification rules,

• documented exceptions,

• and dispute resolution paths.

Not to control —

but to remember.

At this stage, governance begins to reduce conflict, not just prevent harm.

________________________________________

Level 3: Intermediate Governance — “Absorb Shocks”

This is where systems face stress:

• seasonal volatility,

• staff turnover,

• market swings.

Governance here introduces:

• incentive alignment,

• loss-sharing logic,

• and formal escalation mechanisms.

This level allows the system to survive bad seasons

without rewriting rules each time.

________________________________________

Level 4: Advanced Governance — “Scale Without Losing Soul”

At scale, governance must handle:

• large volumes,

• multiple crops,

• diverse regions,

• and partner organisations.

This level includes:

• robust traceability,

• partner governance,

• processing risk controls,

• and brand protection logic.

Importantly, it also includes ethical exit protocols.

Scale without governance is extraction.

Governance without scale awareness is bureaucracy.

________________________________________

Level 5: Full Governance — “Institutional Memory”

Very few systems reach this level —

and even fewer sustain it.

Here, governance becomes:

• culture,

• habit,

• and shared understanding.

Rules are known implicitly.

Signals are trusted.

Conflicts are resolved calmly.

At this level, governance stops feeling like governance.

It feels like maturity.

________________________________________

One size does not fit all

A small FPO does not need the same stack as a national brand.

A milk cooperative does not operate like a vegetable aggregator.

A pilot does not need enterprise compliance.

Governance must match:

• risk,

• reversibility,

• and consequence.

Excess governance is as dangerous as none.

________________________________________

The danger of copying governance

Many organisations copy governance from:

• corporates,

• donors,

• or certification bodies.

This often fails because:

• context differs,

• incentives differ,

• and pressure points differ.

Governance must be grown, not imported.

________________________________________

Governance must be visible where it matters

The best governance is not hidden in manuals.

It is visible at:

• collection points,

• payment moments,

• rejection conversations,

• and exits.

If governance is invisible at stress points,

it doesn’t exist.

________________________________________

A simple stack governance test

Ask this:

“If this system doubles in volume next season, which part will break first?”

The answer tells you which layer is missing.

________________________________________

Why this chapter matters

Many procurement failures are not about intent or competence.

They are about mis-sized governance.

Too much too early.

Too little too late.

A stack allows growth without betrayal.

________________________________________

What comes next

Governance only works if people can learn it.

SOPs don’t teach judgement.

Stories do.

That is where we close this doctrine.